It’s
my third year of teaching language. I believe that Content Based Instruction
(CBI) has always been integrated with Second Language Teaching (SLT). I’ve
always used different contents in order to sustain the interests of my students
and at the same time, teach them the second language.
According
to Ticko (1985), Language Across Curriculum (LAC) is easier for primary school
teachers because they are mostly self-contained. In most cases, they teach all
the subjects for their class. They tend to feel more responsible to use the
LAC. On the other hand, language teaching becomes the responsibility of the
language teacher during their secondary school. The teachers of other subjects
feel that they are not qualified to integrate other fields in their subject.
I
think it’s about time that the 21st century teachers should
integrate second language teaching in their subject. Maybe the reason why
teachers have to take the general education exam in the LET is to know if the
teachers have the capabilities to have understanding in different fields.
Moreover,
language teachers should keep in mind that the absence of meaningful content is
a danger in many communicative learning programs. Students must be exposed to a
meaningful content in order to not only improve their basic interpersonal
communication skills (BICS) but also their cognitive academic language
proficiency (CALP).
In
conclusion, I believe that if language teachers and non-language teachers will
really have a better coordination and collaboration, the students will be able
to improve their BICS and CALP.
As a student, I really believe that being
exposed to multidisciplinary approach in learning the second language teaching
will really broaden my horizon. It will help me develop my full potential in
the mastery of using second language in different content areas.
No comments:
Post a Comment